Read Tender Services on Blogger

Follow me on LinkedIn

FacebookFollow us on Facebook

TwitterFollow me on Twitter


 
   

Tender Services Blog

Our blog "Tender Bytes" is published regularly on www.Tender-Services.com

Some recent blogs include:

Tender Byte No 9 : “Arm's Length”

I’ve often been told that you can’t develop a relationship with your prospective client during the formal tendering process. There is a fair amount of truth in this – they certainly hold you at arm’s length inasmuch as all questions and answers are circulated for all to see, and everything is kept strictly above board.

 

However, simply asking intelligent questions – over the phone if possible – will begin to create an impression that could work in your favour later.

 

I’ve been asked by clients, from time to time, to follow up tenders that they have failed to win. I’ve even been told on such occasions that one of the elements that has worked in the successful tenderer’s favour has been the amount of questions that they’ve asked. This has clearly translated into achieving a high score in the tender submission. The point being, the more clarification you seek the better your chance of getting the answer right.

 

My tip is, be careful how you do it, but don’t assume you can’t develop a dialogue and establish a relationship during the formal tender process – and ask lots and lots of questions.

 

Tender Byte No 8 : “All you have to do is answer the questions!”

Tenders normally contain a set of questions. Some of them may sometimes seem a little strange, but logic would dictate that just writing an answer should be enough.

 

However, that may lead to composing an answer that fails to score well. Further analysis of the question could unearth deeper meaning.

 

Key points to consider:

  • Why have they asked the question?
  • What is the right answer?
  • What information are they looking for?

You may be surprised by what you can glean. The real meaning of the question may be cunningly disguised behind an innocent looking facade! In order to understand this you have to put yourself in the mind of the questioner. What might you be looking for if you were setting the tender?

 

This may sound over-analytical. Getting it right may shed some light on what appear to be very strange questions, but getting it wrong may cost you the tender.

 

So my tip is – don’t just take tender questions at face value. A little detective work, some psychology and plenty of verbal reasoning will be of enormous value and could pay off handsomely.



Tender Byte No 7 : "The Value of the Lost Tender"

When you win a tender the value is clear to see. But when you lose one it may all seem like wasted effort. Clearly you haven’t won any business, and if you leave it at that there will be no further benefit to be gleaned.

 

However, if you regard all tenders that you submit as being part of the overall sales and marketing process of your business much more can be gained. Simply put – always ask for feedback. I find that people are usually very happy to provide feedback, and, although they probably won’t talk about specific competitors, you can get a very good measure of how you stack up against the competition.

 

Having received the feedback the question is how best to use it. What you are looking for is not just how well you answered that specific tender – but how you are shaped up as a business to address particular issues, and whether you are pitching your business effectively. So, getting feedback from a number of tenders and spotting trends is really important.

 

My tip is this: always ask for feedback. You may be surprised how much you get, and how useful it can be!


Tender Byte No 6 : "Write the answer ... then read the question"

Of course, you should have read the question before writing the answer. However only reading it before you answer the question is very dangerous. It is surprisingly easy to find yourself answering what you thought the question was, only to find, on re-reading it, carefully, that it actually asked something else.

The temptation at this point is to pretty much make do with what you have written, and just change it a little. However you score no points for a good answer if it doesn’t answer the question! If it requires completely re-writing that is what you will need to do.

 

My tip is, read the question, re-read the question and read it again. In fact, keep on referring to the question until you are fully satisfied with the answer.


Tender Byte No 5 : "Closely Related!"

Formal requests to tender are invariably full of complex questions. So much so that the natural inclination often is to find an answer as quickly as possible to each question and move on to the next one.

Finding an answer can involve scouring the various pieces of material you have and finding something on the topic in question. Once found this material is copied and pasted into the answer – job done!

 

Or is it?

 

If this material is simply related to the topic and doesn’t answer the question it will simple not do – you will score minimal points (if any), and run the risk of failing to reach the next stage in the bid process.

 

So my tip is simple. Read the question carefully ... and make sure you answer it!!


Tender Byte No 4 : "Similar Question : SameAnswer?"


Do you ever read the questions in a tender document and find that a question appears to have been asked twice? Often these questions appear in different sections of the document.

 

Your reaction may be, “These people are incompetent,” and you simply deal with it by offering the same answer twice.

 

BEWARE – this is an easy trap to fall into.

 

These questions have probably been posed by different people, both inputting into the tender document. Each one will be looking for something different. The difference will become apparent on examination of the subtleties of the way the question has been asked. In order to compose the best answer it is best to really establish what he question is trying to get at.

 

My tip, therefore, is not to take questions at face value. Make sure you really read them thoroughly, and submit a carefully thought-through answer for each.


Tender Byte No 3 : "Start at the End"


The good thing about a formal tender response (ITT, PQQ etc) is that you know absolutely when the job has to be done by. So when putting the project plan together it is very straightforward to start at the end and work back from there.

 

However, the temptation when starting a complex task of this nature is to start by getting on with the big elements, and deal with the leftover bits of detail later. Caution – it is these bits which may be the most time consuming, or which, even more importantly, may require a lead time. If you leave them to the last minute, and the lead time exceeds the time left, woe betide!

 

My tip is, plan all the tasks from the end back, and work out which ones need starting first. Once started you will then be able to get on with the big elements with the comfort of knowing that everything is under control.


Tender Byte No 2 : “Demystifying the TLAs (3 letter abbreviations)”

The world of formal tendering is full of buzz words and acronyms. Formal opportunities come with all sorts of labels. These can be broken down into those where you are invited to pitch for contracts, and those where, at this stage, they just want information from you.

                     

The TLAs used include:

 

ITT – Invitation to Tender

PQQ – Pre Qualification Questionnaire

RFI – Request for Information

RFP – Request for Proposal

RFQ – Request for Quotation

 

What’s more, if you are new to tendering, this is just the first encounter you will have with a whole new world of phraseology and terms that can be completely mind-numbing!

 

Future Tender Bytes will be designed to provide tips and hints into this world – and ultimately demystify it!


Tender Byte No : 1 “Wired Tenders”

Interesting discussion on LinkedIn between bid writers. They always try to work out if a tender is "wired". In other words - has one bidder managed to get the tender written in such a way as to favour them!

From a sales manager's point of view the perspective is different. A good sales person always tries to get to a prospect prior to the tender process in order to do just that. A very good sales person spends a lot of time doing this, and does fewer tenders. They achieve much better strike rates by doing this, and win much better deals.

 

Poor sales people, conversely, fall into "The Tender Trap", and are always so busy completing tenders that they never have time to get any wired!


Industry Buzzwords

"Environmental Awareness" has become "Sustainability", "Equal Opportunities" has become "Diversity". I wonder what the next buzzwords will be? 


Cleaning Tenders

I am seeing a huge amount of tenders offering cleaning contracts at the moment. Helping companies with submitting winning bids for these is becoming more and more frequent.
  

Security Tenders

Security tenders are not as common as cleaning tenders. Nevertheless I am seeing a large ammounts of these too - daily! Helping companies with submitting winning bids for these is also becoming more and more frequent.

 

 

Telephone: 0845 224 2294

 

Tender Services (formerly Rob Parker Associates) is part of Momentum Consulting

Website Created and Maintained by WSI

  Site Map